首页> 外文OA文献 >Safety and immunogenicity of two influenza virus subunit vaccines, with or without MF59 adjuvant, administered to human immunodeficiency virus type 1-seropositive and -seronegative adults.
【2h】

Safety and immunogenicity of two influenza virus subunit vaccines, with or without MF59 adjuvant, administered to human immunodeficiency virus type 1-seropositive and -seronegative adults.

机译:两种含或不含MF59佐剂的流感病毒亚单位疫苗的安全性和免疫原性,均适用于人免疫缺陷病毒1型血清反应阳性和血清阴性的成年人。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare both the safety and tolerability and the humoral and cell-mediated immune responses for two influenza virus subunit vaccines, one with MF59 adjuvant (Fluad) and one without an adjuvant (Agrippal), in healthy and in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected adult individuals. To achieve this aim, an open, randomized, comparative clinical trial was performed during the 2005-2006 season. A total of 256 subjects were enrolled to receive one dose of vaccine intramuscularly. Blood samples were taken at the time of vaccination and at 1 and 3 months postvaccination. A good humoral antibody response was detected for both vaccines, meeting all the criteria of the Committee for Medical Products for Human Use. After Beyer's correction for prevaccination status, Fluad exhibited better immunogenicity than Agrippal, as shown from the analysis of the geometric mean titers, with significant differences for some virus strains; however, no definitive conclusions on the clinical significance of such results can be drawn, because the method used to estimate antibody response is currently nonstandard for influenza virus vaccines. Significant induction of an antigen-specific CD4+ T-lymphocyte proliferative response was detected at all time points after immunization, for both the vaccines, among HIV-1-seronegative subjects. This was different from what was observed for HIV-1-infected individuals. In this group, significance was not reached at 30 days postvaccination (T30) for those immunized with Agrippal. Also when data were compared between treatment groups, a clear difference in the response at T30 was observed in favor of Fluad (P = 0.0002). The safety profiles of both vaccines were excellent. For HIV-1-infected individuals, no significant changes either in viremia or in the CD4+ cell count were observed at any time point. The results showed good safety and immunogenicity for both vaccines under study for both uninfected and HIV-1-infected adults, confirming current recommendations for immunization of this high-risk category.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估和比较两种流感病毒亚单位疫苗的安全性和耐受性以及体液和细胞介导的免疫反应,其中一种疫苗含有MF59佐剂(Fluad),另一种不含佐剂(Agrippal),在健康和感染了人类免疫缺陷病毒1型(HIV-1)的成年个体。为了实现这一目标,在2005-2006赛季进行了一项开放,随机,比较的临床试验。共有256名受试者通过肌肉注射一剂疫苗。在疫苗接种时以及疫苗接种后1和3个月取血样。两种疫苗均检测到良好的体液抗体反应,符合人用医疗产品委员会的所有标准。根据对几何平均滴度的分析表明,经过Beyer校正预疫苗接种状态后,Fluad的免疫原性优于Agrippal。但是,由于用于估计抗体反应的方法目前对于流感病毒疫苗尚不标准,因此无法得出关于此类结果的临床意义的明确结论。在HIV-1血清阴性受试者中,两种疫苗在免疫后的所有时间点均检测到抗原特异性CD4 + T淋巴细胞增殖反应的显着诱导。这不同于对HIV-1感染者的观察。在该组中,对于用Agrippal免疫的人,在接种后30天(T30)没有达到显着性。同样,当比较治疗组之间的数据时,观察到在T30时反应明显不同,有利于Fluad(P = 0.0002)。两种疫苗的安全性都非常好。对于感染HIV-1的个体,在任何时间点均未观察到病毒血症或CD4 +细胞计数的显着变化。结果表明,针对未感染和感染HIV-1的成年人,两种疫苗均具有良好的安全性和免疫原性,从而证实了目前对该高风险类别的疫苗进行免疫的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号